By Sanjay Mewada, Analyst and Chief Research Officer
The monthly bill is the most frequent touchpoint between the carrier and the customer. More consistent than network usage, more personal than advertising, more consequential than store visits. Yet billing systems remain among the oldest technologies in most operator portfolios. Platforms deployed a decade ago still generate millions of bills monthly, and that legacy shows up directly in customer satisfaction scores and churn rates.
Recon Analytics analyzed 1.47 million US consumer and business survey responses collected from Q3 2022 through Q4 2025 to quantify the billing experience gap. The findings are stark: billing issues drive churn at a 2.5x multiplier, and the carriers with the oldest billing platforms bleed customers to competitors running modern systems. At industry-average lifetime values, billing-related churn costs the Big Three wireless carriers an estimated $2 to $3 billion annually.
T-Mobile’s Platform Advantage Is Real and Persistent
T-Mobile leads wireless bill clarity with a component Net Promoter Score (cNPS) of +17.7, a 10-point advantage over Verizon at +7.1, and a 12-point advantage over AT&T at +5.5. This gap has held steady across 14 consecutive quarters of survey data. The consistency is not coincidental. T-Mobile completed its post-Sprint billing integration on Amdocs’s cloud-native platform in 2021. AT&T and Verizon continue to run hybrid stacks with legacy components dating back to the previous decade.
The quarterly trend data tells the story. AT&T moved from -6.8 in Q4 2022 to +11.9 in Q4 2024, an 18.7-point improvement over two years. Verizon climbed from -0.9 to +13.4, a 14.3-point gain. T-Mobile advanced from +8.8 to +24.0 over the same period. All three carriers improved substantially, suggesting industry-wide investment in billing transparency driven by competitive pressure and regulatory scrutiny. Yet the rank order never changed. T-Mobile’s platform advantage persisted through every quarter.
The prepaid and value-oriented carriers demonstrate what billing simplicity can achieve. Consumer Cellular leads the industry at +44.3 cNPS, followed by Straight Talk at +35.7 and Cricket at +31.5. These carriers benefit from simpler pricing structures with fewer promotional bundles, no multi-line complexity, and straightforward monthly charges. The gap between Cricket at +31.5 and its parent, AT&T, at +5.5 shows that pricing architecture matters more than operational capability. Both run on AT&T systems; only Cricket delivers billing simplicity.
Fixed Wireless Delivers the Best Billing Experience in the Market
The technology hierarchy in billing satisfaction is unambiguous. Fixed wireless customers rate their billing experience 33 points higher than cable broadband customers. T-Mobile FWA leads at +40.6 cNPS, followed by Verizon FWA at +35.0, then a steep drop to AT&T Fiber at +21.6. The cable operators cluster in the low double digits: Spectrum at +13.9, Cox at +12.6, and Xfinity at +7.4.
The fixed wireless advantage stems from greenfield billing deployments. These services launched in 2021 and 2022 on modern BSS platforms with single-price, all-inclusive monthly charges. No promotional layering, no equipment rental fees, no bundled discount complexity. Cable operators manage decades of accumulated pricing structures with promotional rates that expire, bundled discounts across video, internet, and phone, equipment rentals, and regional rate variations.
The 33-point gap between the highest performer, T-Mobile FWA at +40.6, and Xfinity broadband at +7.4 represents the full span of billing experience differentiation in the market. This is the measurable outcome of greenfield billing deployments on modern BSS platforms versus decades of accumulated complexity on legacy systems.
Billing Problems Create a Churn Multiplier Effect
Customers who experience billing problems show 32.5% churn intent, compared with 13.2% for those without billing issues. That 2.5x multiplier directly translates into revenue risk. The carrier-specific data make the exposure concrete.
AT&T customers report the highest incidence of billing problems: 12.0% experienced confusing bills, and 12.1% reported billing errors in the past 90 days. When those AT&T customers have billing issues, 41.3% plan to leave their carrier. Compare that to T-Mobile, where 8.0% experience confusing bills and 33.3% of those plan to leave. Verizon sits in the middle at 8.2% billing confusion incidence with 26.7% churn intent among affected customers.
AT&T faces the worst combination: highest billing issue incidence and highest churn sensitivity among those affected. The 12% incidence rate combined with 41.3% churn sensitivity means roughly 5% of AT&T’s customer base is simultaneously experiencing billing friction and actively planning to leave.
Cricket’s prepaid model delivers meaningfully lower billing friction. At 5.5% bill confusion and 7.0% billing errors, Cricket outperforms its parent AT&T by roughly 50%. The prepaid pricing model — with fixed monthly charges, no promotional layering, no multi-line complexity, and no surprise fees — eliminates most sources of billing confusion.
ISP Billing Support: Technology Determines Everything
Home internet billing support satisfaction varies dramatically by technology type, and the pattern is consistent enough to consider it structural. Fixed wireless customers rate billing support at +9.6 cNPS aggregate. Fiber customers rate it at +3.3. Cable customers rate it at -12.8. DSL customers rate it at -16.4.
The 26-point gap between the best and worst technology categories reflects decades of accumulated billing complexity in legacy systems versus the clean-slate simplicity of FWA platforms. Verizon Fixed Wireless leads individual providers at +13.8 cNPS for billing support, followed by T-Mobile Fixed Wireless at +11.4. AT&T Fiber sits at +3.6, still positive but well below the FWA leaders. Below the line, Spectrum sits at -9.4, Cox at -12.0, Xfinity at -14.1, and CenturyLink at -21.4.
ISP customers who call for billing questions show dramatically elevated churn intent. Among those who called, 35.8% plan to leave their provider, compared to 18.8% of those who did not need to call. The 17-point gap represents a 1.9x churn multiplier. Every billing support call signals a customer at elevated flight risk.
The Business Segment Shows What Good Support Can Achieve
Business billing support scores substantially exceed consumer scores across all carriers. T-Mobile leads business mobile billing support at +17.7 cNPS, followed closely by AT&T at +17.2 and Verizon at +14.5. The 15 to 20-point premium over consumer scores reflects dedicated account management, enterprise support channels, and business customers’ lower tolerance for poor service.
The narrow spread among carriers — just 3.2 points from top to bottom — indicates that competition in B2B billing support has converged toward a common standard. Elements of the business support model, including dedicated contacts, case ownership, and proactive outreach, could be selectively applied to high-value consumer segments. Premium unlimited plan customers paying $90 or more per month warrant support investment that matches their revenue contribution.
What This Means for the Market
The correlation between BSS platform age and billing cNPS is too consistent to ignore. Carriers running systems deployed before 2020 face structural disadvantage that incremental improvements cannot overcome. AT&T’s 10.7-point improvement in billing support cNPS over three years suggests that platform migration delivers measurable results, but current levels remain negative for most legacy providers.
Competitive exposure intensifies as FWA scales. Fixed wireless providers deliver 25 to 35-point cNPS advantages on billing clarity and support. As FWA expands beyond rural markets into suburban cable footprints, the billing experience gap becomes a competitive weapon. Cable operators face a structural dilemma: their bundled service model creates billing complexity that FWA’s simple pricing avoids.
Price dominates stated churn reasons across both wireless and ISP categories. Verizon intenders cite “too expensive” at 25.6%, significantly higher than AT&T at 18.2% and T-Mobile at 15.2%. Among ISP customers planning to leave, Spectrum customers cite price at 40.6%, followed by Cox at 38.5%, Xfinity at 37.7%, and Verizon Fios at 34.8%. The dominance of price as a churn driver reinforces the importance of billing clarity. Customers who perceive their bills as unpredictable or confusing experience price as a larger pain point than those who understand exactly what they’re paying for.
Regulatory and reputational risks compound the financial exposure. The FCC’s billing transparency requirements continue to tighten. State attorneys general pursue billing practice investigations. Consumer advocacy groups amplify complaints through social media. Operators with high billing complaint volumes face reputational damage beyond the direct customer impact.
The carriers and ISPs that invest in platform modernization, pricing simplification, and support excellence will capture disproportionate share of customer loyalty and lifetime value. Those that treat billing as a cost center will continue bleeding customers to competitors who understand that every bill is a moment of truth.
The comprehensive report providing deeper analysis, conclusions, and recommendations is available on ReconAnalytics.com.
—
Methodology: Recon Analytics surveyed 1.47 million US consumer respondents and 53,000 business respondents from Q3 2022 through Q4 2025. Component NPS (cNPS) calculated using standard methodology: percentage of promoters (9-10 scores) minus percentage of detractors (0-6 scores). Current as of December 28, 2025.
Contact: [email protected]